Despite the awesomeness that is undoubtedly the 300 film and its epic battles, the fantastic direction, the tremendous cinematography by Zack Snyder, and most of the impressive special effects, the site is quite extraordinary. Therefore the focus is on the historical inaccuracies of this movie.
Inaccuracies of the movie
They were identifying a few of these ancient inaccuracies, starting at the film, you can easily view members of the senate, from the then-political system of Sparta portrayed as unpleasant monsters. Yet, in reality, Sparta’s senate contained 30 members that were respected and accepted by taxpayers. According to historical records, 28 senate members boasting a rich history of donations and relationships being one of their Greek city-state’s elite circles and should’ve already been more than 60 years old.
There is another significant historical inaccuracy of the film since Sparta has ever been known as the only Greek city-state with just two sins; you proceeded to war and headed the army, and the other remained in Sparta to command their country. In this manner, the government and military remained educated, and the king kept them.
The movie commits another mistake by showing a boy hunting from the hills alone, about Spartan training. Historical signs are contradicted by this minimizing the occurrence of preventable fatal injuries throughout training, enabling them to learn from their childhood, the way to function within an organized group of musicians, and showing young warriors hunted in little classes.
Zack Snyder additionally presents Spartans fighting almost nude, wearing only leather panties and a red cape, practically certainly motivated by Superman’s outfit. But, based on Snyder, the movie was more based on Frank Miller and Lynn Varley’s 1998 comic series of the identical name, compared to actual history. The Spartan warrior wore kilograms of war equipment. As for why the clothing Spartan warriors wore within their military iron equipment were so reddish, according to Lycurgus, legendary legislator, this color simultaneously experienced a weak influence on the opponent, also helped to hide Spartan warriors’ blood when they were hurt.
One of the most popular scenes of this film is a product of fiction instead of reality. Xerxes never delivered messengers demanding him to abdicate to Leonidas, and Leonidas never murdered by throwing said messenger. Herodotus mentions Xerxes never sent any messengers to ask the Spartans to cancel; this had happened before.
Still, another inaccuracy is made up of the fact that Leonidas seemingly owns a face-to-face conversation with Xerxes, a meeting never recorded by Herodotus. The majority of characters from the film, in addition to Xerxes, are depicted as monstrous-looking creatures, bloodthirsty, misogynist, and wicked. In truth, they were listed as well-trained and also educated soldiers having great respect for culture and culture.
Last but not least, we come into the Spartan soldier named Dilios. Leonidas himself delivered Dilios straight back again to Sparta before the previous struggle in Thermopylae, asserting Dilios had a terrific gift with words and may provide the “message” of the heroic resistance to everyone in their own life.
Briefly, before the end of the film, Dilios also appears directing the united Greek army in the battle of Plataea, not just a mere inaccuracy, but also a historical crime, given the pioneer of the Greek military within this particular struggle were among the most famous generals who’ve lived, Pausanias.